For Archives of past letters, click here


This has opened a new browser window.  
You may close it, minimise, resize as usual, without losing your place in the website.

SOUTH WEST FIRST   print this page
LETTER FROM STRASBOURG 
September 2003      


See also September letter 2 - added 6 October 2003

NOT SO QUIET

On the face of it the first  Strasbourg session after the summer looked to be a quietish week for my areas of responsibility.  Not so, as I found things coming at me faster than I could deal with.

 

CHALLENGES GALORE

The biggest challenge loomed on Tuesday at the meeting for all EPP-ED (European Peoples Party – European Democrats group, of which we Conservatives are allied members) members of the ITRE (Industry, External Trade, Research & Energy) Committee.  One of my jobs as co-ordinator is the attribution of reports i.e. who gets to do what, and I needed to appoint a Rapporteur for the proposal on stem cell research from the Commission.

 

CLASH OF VIEWS

This is a very tricky issue in which the protagonists are Christian Democrat and Catholic guardians of the sanctity of life, who are fundamentally opposed to any form of research involving human embryo tissues and what might be described as liberal progressives who support research which may alleviate diseases such as Parkinsons.  In U.K. terms this is a conscience issue.

 

A HOT POTATO

In political terms it is a hot potato for me to choose someone that my colleagues will support.  Seeking some form of compromise and consensus between the two points of view, I recommended an Italian MEP who knows the subject well, could liaise with the current Italian Presidency of the Council and might just be able to reconcile positions.  My German colleagues turned up in strength and without exception spoke strongly in favour of another MEP (a German) who is widely associated in the Parliament with their Christian Democratic position.

 

NO WIN SITUATION

After a long discussion I held a vote and the German view prevailed by 11 to 10.  This was something of a pyrrhic victory in my view because the Rapporteur will have to take into account the strong body of alternative opinion in our group and the likely majority opinion in other groups and run the risk of neither satisfying his own camp nor the others with a strong possibility that the report will be voted down (as has happened before on this type of issue) so the Commission proposal goes through unamended.  We shall see.  I’m with the progressives on this one, in case you wondered.

 

MORE CONTROVERSY

Also on Tuesday I had meetings with the Vice President for Scientific Communication of AREVA and representatives of FORATOM with regard to the nuclear package of proposals, another topic which is not without controversy.  AREVA is the holding company for French nuclear businesses COGEMA and Framatome, which deal with waste management & disposal and nuclear power plant construction respectively.

 

TIMELY VISITS

Having just visited their nuclear re-processing and waste treatment plant at Cap de la Hague near Cherbourg and their research facility at Marcoule north of Marseilles, the practical side of the issue was fresh in my mind, so I was better able to discuss  the technical aspects of the nuclear safety directive and the radioactive waste management directive and listen to their concerns.

 

NUCLEAR SAFETY

I suppose the over-riding issue is whether nuclear safety should be communitarised with responsibilities being taken over by the Commission from the present national regulation under overall supervision by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) based in Vienna (and widely respected).  I should explain that FORATOM is the trade association for European nuclear industries so it speaks for all eight nuclear powers member states as well as nuclear power countries shortly due to join the E.U.

 

TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY

Lack of space means I must leave the technical background and arguments floating in the air, but the fact is the nuclear industry is already the most highly regulated one around and I share the view that questions what could be gained by interposing another layer of bureaucracy.

 

MEASURING INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE

Another familiar topic dropped back in my lap this week, namely the Common Position of the Council on MID (Measuring Instruments Directive), which must have the Parliament’s Second Reading within three months (90 days sounds like even less time!).  So as Rapporteur I will have to get my skates on, not least because I have a very full diary this autumn and because the thing runs to nearly 240 pages (of which only 28 are Directive and the rest are annexes where the devil is definitely in the detail!)

 

DEMAND FOR A REFERENDUM

Plenty of other things were on the agenda this week, of which the most important, probably, werethe debate about Iraq and the debate on the Draft European Constitution led by Valery Giscard d’Estaing, the grand old man of European politics.  This prompts me to remind recipients of this newsletter, they can view the text of this draft constitution on my website if they want to, have some time and don’t suffer from high blood pressure.  With hard copy versions of this month’s edition is a copy of the postcard we have designed for people to send to No. 10 demanding a referendum.  We know Blair’s answer, but it must be a good thing to annoy and embarrass him about his selective approach to referenda (or ums if you prefer).


Promoted and published by GILES CHICHESTER MEP, 48 Queen Street, Exeter, EX4 3SR

Tel:  01392 491815  Fax:  01392 491588  


September letter - 2

 

TRIBUTE TO ANNA LINDH

The second September session opens with a tribute and a minute’s silence for Anna Lindh, the assassinated Foreign Minister of Sweden. Conspicuous by its absence was any reference to the outcome of the Swedish referendum on the euro.  Signed up supporters of the European project only like mentioning the results they agree with!

 

UNNECESSARY INTERVENTION 

I had a busy Monday including a discussion about the Measuring Instruments Directive, a special committee meeting, a co-ordination meeting, a speech in a plenary debate as well as grappling with the usual paperwork and Treasurers’ items.  The speech was about Commission proposals for oil and gas reserves which I argued were an unnecessary piece of intervention, a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist (as a green colleague said).

 

IF IT AIN’T BROKE………

I had succeeded in getting over 32 colleagues to sign an amendment to reject the oil proposal on the grounds that the IEA (International Energy Agency) system set up in the 1970s works very well (so why re-invent the wheel and replace it) and trying to use reserves to smooth the market doesn’t work. I extracted an assurance from Energy Commissioner de Palacio that she would respect the result if my amendment succeeded and not seek to re-introduce it by some other route.

 

A WEIGHTY SLIM?

Tuesday is always my busiest day of the week and this time I had extra pressure from the need to discuss detailed amendments to the Common Position of the Council on the draft directive for measuring instruments for which I am Rapporteur. This is a weighty piece of legislation approximately 240 pages long including annexes containing a great deal of technical detail and which I dearly wish to cut and simplify.

 

MAJOR COUP

I also had a meeting with some Dutch industrialists to discuss energy policy at the request of a Dutch colleague, before going to votes half an hour earlier than usual because of a formal session with the Romanian President addressing the Parliament. The vote on my amendment came in the earlier part and I am pleased to report that we won it comfortably.

 

ABSOLUTE MAJORITY

I had deliberately avoided having a roll-call or recorded vote which might have reduced support and, when we had an electronic check, the vote was 473 participated with 337 in favour, 130 against and 6 abstentions.  That means an absolute majority of the Parliament supported my amendment against the Commission, an emphatic rejection and a good example of what I mean when talking about some of our best successes being things we stop.

 

GOOD HOUSEKEEPING

After the votes came a working lunch meeting of the bureau (or management committee) of we Conservatives in the European Parliament which included my Treasurers report. This month it is more a case of Genial Giles than Monsieur Non (my usual nickname for obvious reasons) announcing sound finances.

 

MUSCLES FLEXED

Then I have to move on to chair, as Co-ordinator, the meeting for all EPP-ED (European Peoples Party-European Democrats of which we Conservatives are allied members) members of the Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (ITRE) Committee. This session we have a good debate about the nuclear package of proposals for safety standards and de-commissioning. This looks like turning into another vigorous disagreement with the Commission and a possible vote to reject. Anyone would think there was an election coming up with MEPs willing to flex their muscles visibly!

 

CONTRARY CONTENDERS

Next comes our full UK Delegation meeting for all Conservative MEPs where we discuss issues of the moment as well as all sorts of other things - two of which were to hear from the German and Spanish EPP MEP contenders to be one of the Parliament’s representatives on the forthcoming IGC (Inter-Governmental Conference) about this draft constitution (visit my website to view the text as long as your blood pressure can stand it!). This is a bit tricky since neither of them even remotely represents our point of view!

 

LIKE POLES ATTRACT!!

The second other thing was a visit by two Leaders of the Polish Law and Justice party observers. They appear to very much share our views on a wide range of issues and we all hope they do well in next year’s European Parliament Elections so they can reinforce our numbers and influence within the next Parliament. There was a certain element of harking back to the past which might make relations with the Germans problematic, but we shall see.

 

GALLIC SUPPORT

Next I had a further meeting with George the committee secretariat member dealing with the measuring instruments directive. And a meeting with representatives of Total Fina Elf who are very pleased about the oil stocks vote. They played a part in encouraging French MEPs to both sign my amendment and vote for it. Later in the evening I attended the EPP-ED Group meeting to hear a discussion of other issues coming up for votes on Wednesday and Thursday.

 

CONSTITUENTS’ CONCERNS

In this September session of the Parliament, there have been half a dozen topics which are of relevance or interest to constituents in the South West, judging from my postbag and email inbox.

 

IT’S ALL IN THE DETAIL

Probably the most interest has been aroused by the directive on patentability of computer-implemented inventions. This is a rather complex matter where the big problems seem to revolve around the difference between copyright and patents and the definitions of invention, technical feature, computer programme and so forth.

 

INVENTION DEFINITION

Fortunately for me, I haven’t the space here to go into all the detail except to set down the main definition of “a computer-implemented invention as any invention in the sense of the European Patent Convention the performance of which involves the use of a computer, computer network or other programmable apparatus and having in its implementation one or more non-technical features which are realised wholly or partly by a computer programme or computer programmes, besides the technical features that any invention must contribute.” So that’s perfectly clear, is it?

 

COSTLY ADVICE

Next is the Investment Services Directive and the Report on it by my colleague Theresa Villiers MEP which aims to set a Europe-wide regulatory framework for the very important service industry. It has been strongly supported by the City. It has also been of concern to all those constituents who have contacted me about the threat to execution-only stockbroking from an early requirement that such firms should advise investors of the risks involved (which advice would cost extra and negate the whole point of execution-only lower cost transactions).

 

“JUST TIDYING UP”!?

An important issue was addressed by the debate on the draft European Constitution and the forthcoming IGC (Inter-Governmental Conference) on it. Arguably this is the most important constitutional issue facing us all because, if adopted, it would transform the EU into a legal personality otherwise described as a state (but not according to “just a tidying up exercise” Tony Blair and his government). I certainly don’t have the space to go into the detail but urge readers to visit my website www.gileschichestermep.org.uk to view the draft text. I also urge everyone to write to 10 Downing Street London SW1 to demand a referendum.

 

CANCUN COLLAPSE CAUSES CONCERN

There was a debate about the collapse of the WTO (World Trade Organisation) Ministerial Conference at Cancun in Mexico. You could well ask what is that to us in the South West, but the answer is that global trade and all the related issues about investment, invisible barriers, development and so forth is important to our economy and all our companies that export as well as to those constituents who have contacted me about sustainability and aid in less well-off countries and access to western markets for their agricultural produce.

 

LLOYDS’ “NAME” ENQUIRY  
The Report by my colleague Roy Perry MEP on the Petition by former Lloyds’ ‘Names’ about the conduct of the insurance market, attracted a fair bit of interest. From constituents who feel they and people they know who had been affected on the one hand and from a combination of lobbyists from Lloyds and some Labour MEPs on the other. The petitioners want light cast on what happened and Lloyds seems to feel it is a closed book which should be left shut. We voted in support of the Report and, in effect, for a Committee of Inquiry.  

PRESTIGE PROBLEM

And the sixth topic was a report on the Prestige disaster which has also been a matter raised with me by constituents and several local authorities. The problem is that the whole situation was made much worse by the Spanish authorities decision to refuse the Prestige shelter in a bay or harbour, sending it offshore to break up and sink in deep water, but no-one wants to rock the boat, so to speak, by point this out.  By a clear majority, the Parliament supported a call to set up a temporary committee to look at this subject in more detail.

 
WALL-TO-WALL MEETINGS

Wednesday was another full day for me. I had meetings in the morning with a nice woman from the Australian civil services on one of the Parliament’s visitor programmes and a lobbyist for the music industry on the subject of piracy and downloading from the internet. After votes on some of the issues mentioned above, I had lunch with Commissioner de Palacio to discuss ways forward on the nuclear package.  Then on to a meeting with my shadow or counterpart from the socialist group about Measuring Instruments to explain my thinking and strategy and keep him on board with the approach.

 

AND SO IT GOES ON!

A chunk of the afternoon goes on dealing with diary requests and mail as well as discussing a variety of constituency mail and issues with my assistant who is down the line in Brussels. Then a couple more meetings before I’m off to an Energy Foundation dinner debate on the subject of coal. The main speaker was from UK Coal but wearing a hat as chairman of the European Coal Association. And so it goes on.

 
 

Subscribe to this newsletter and receive free regular email copies - click here

 

COURT OF AUDITORS REPORT View some figures I have extracted from the Court of Auditors Report on the 2000 Budget. They may be of interest. These are scanned in image format. 

Table 1.  Staff numbers by institution and by place of employment as at 31 December 2000

Table 2.  Revenue for the financial years 1999 and 2000

Diagram 1: Payments made in 2000 in each member State 

Diagram 2: Appropriation for commitments available in 2000 and utilisation thereof, by financial perspective heading

Letter sent to South West Daily Newspapers and London Press

"In the context of all the debate about nuclear energy, I do hope the Labour Government will resist any primeval urge to renationalise British Energy.  Nuclear energy supplies about a quarter of our electricity in the UK and more than one third across the European Union. It is virtually a zero emitter of carbon dioxide and all the other greenhouse gases (GHGs). It is vital to a secure, diversified energy supply in Europe.....   cont'd