For Archives of past letters, click here


This has opened a new browser window.  
You may close it, minimise, resize as usual, without losing your place in the website.

 

Letter sent to South West Daily Newspapers and London Press

"In the context of all the debate about nuclear energy, I do hope the Labour Government will resist any primeval urge to renationalise British Energy.  Nuclear energy supplies about a quarter of our electricity in the UK and more than one third across the European Union. It is virtually a zero emitter of carbon dioxide and all the other greenhouse gases (GHGs). It is vital to a secure, diversified energy supply in Europe.....   cont'd  

 

 

SOUTH WEST FIRST

LETTER FROM STRASBOURG - NOVEMBER, 2002  

   

 

LETTER FROM STRASBOURG – NOVEMBER 2002

 
 
WELL THAT'S POLITICS

On Sunday the final stage of our re-selection and list ranking process, on Monday off to Strasbourg for the final session.  I wish to invoke a Conservative curse on the head of Tony Blair for inflicting this awful PR system upon us and robbing us of our euro-constituencies.  However, at least we can now get back to the job of directing fire upon our foes after a stint of internal competition.  Enough said.

 

A GOOD EXCUSE

Some things don’t change, such as the triumph of hope over experience, otherwise known as flying Air France to Strasbourg.  This time, to be fair, there was a novel excuse for the cancelled flight and stranded MEPs.  There were deer loose on the runway at Strasbourg and fog made it very difficult for the authorities to catch or shoot and remove them.  Sounds on a par with leaves on the rails!

 

ENLARGEMENT CONTINUES

The first thing I noticed on arrival was the large number of predominantly male politicians in dark suits from the candidate countries of central and eastern Europe milling around all over the place.  They had come for a two day programme of debate and meetings about enlargement.  There were three consequences that I could see.  The bars of the Parliament were full of strange faces.  Most existing MEPs made themselves scarce to work in their offices (like myself).  There were no votes at noon on Tuesday to permit the debate to continue unchecked.

 

NORMALITY RESUMES

At the end of Tuesday things reverted to normal.  In the meeting for EPP-ED (European Peoples

Party-European Democrats, the centre right political group of which we Conservatives are allied members) members of the Industry Committee, we had a lively discussion about GATS.  That stands for General Agreement on Trade in Services.  The discussion centred on the forthcoming hearing in our committee and how best to counter the anti-globalisation, anti-liberalisation agenda of the greens and others.

 

A POINT OF PRINCIPLE

We also touched on the Intelligent Energy proposal.  This sounds like an oxymoron to me, but I failed to persuade my continental colleagues to get the joke.  More to the point, it contained specific proposals to establish yet another agency, to increase the budget and provide for five MEPs to sit on the advisory committee overseeing the programme of measures (really they mean energy efficiency).  We Conservatives opposed all of these points on principle and I was able to persuade our EPP-ED colleagues to oppose the third suggestion.  That is because it crossed the dividing line between our role as legislators and scrutineers and the Commission role as the executive arm.

 

HERBAL MEDICINES

On Wednesday a couple of reports are debated that have been causing  concern at home.  One is the Herbal Medicine draft Directive, which has given rise to fears that many products currently available will be forced off the market.  Actually a provision for accepting products on sale over the past ten years has been included.  (I even voted for a liberal amendment pushing for 30 years).  The main target for the measure is some imported Chinese products which have killed people, not the vast majority of herbal medicines.

 

TEMPORARY WORKERS

The other topic was the Temporary Agency Workers draft directive.  This is aimed at giving all such workers exactly the same rights as full-time long-term staff.  The consequences of this measure for the U.K. could be to threaten the livelihood of 160,000 workers.   After all, if an employer wanted full-time long-term staff, he or she would employ them, but if confronted with the choice between a temporary worker who must be treated as having all rights or not taking anyone on at all, my guess is that the latter option would be chosen.  We failed in our amendments to moderate many of the most inflexible provisions.

 

ANGLO GERMAN DEBATE

My week closed with a talk (in English) to a group of German students being sponsored to visit the Parliament by a German colleague.  They were a lively bunch full of questions and seemed pretty sensible (except for the nice young woman who was clearly a green supporter) but then they came from Bavaria which is the most Conservative part of their country.  Could South West students debate politics in German, I wonder?

 

May I wish everyone a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year and confusion to our enemies. 

 

Final thought, please let me know your email address, so I can send future newsletters electronically.

   

   

Please add me to your regular e-mailing list  

Items in red are required before successful submission of the form

Name  
Email address (please check carefully) 
Telephone  (optional)
Address (optional)
Country (optional)
Any additional background information on yourself that you would like to give 

 

 

 

COURT OF AUDITORS REPORT View some figures I have extracted from the Court of Auditors Report on the 2000 Budget. They may be of interest. These are scanned in image format. 

Table 1.  Staff numbers by institution and by place of employment as at 31 December 2000

Table 2.  Revenue for the financial years 1999 and 2000

Diagram 1: Payments made in 2000 in each member State 

Diagram 2: Appropriation for commitments available in 2000 and utilisation thereof, by financial perspective heading

[toc.htm]