For Archives of past letters, click here


This has opened a new browser window.  
You may close it, minimise, resize as usual, without losing your place in the website.

SOUTH WEST FIRST

Letter From Strasbourg  July 2001

 

AT LAST……….

The smell of summer is upon us and Strasbourg swelters for the final session before the break.  The building seems unusually quiet when I arrive on Monday, yet I have plenty on my plate for the week.

 

NEW PRESIDENCY

The perceived highlights of the week (according to the Parliament Directorate for Press and Audiovisual Services) are the end of the Swedish Presidency of the Council of Ministers and the start of the Belgian Presidency (each lasts for six months); the presentation of the ECB (European Central Bank) Annual Report for 2000; the final decision on the Take-Overs Directive; a debate on human rights  across the world; a discussion on EU (European Union, as if you didn't know) strategy for the forthcoming UN (United Nations) climate change conference; the issue of aid for Yugoslavia and a statement on the forthcoming G8 Summit (G8=G7 top seven economies in the world plus Russia) from the European Commission.

 

COMPLACENT INDULGENCE

Before moving onto my week, which covered a rather different range of topics and meetings, I can't resist commenting on the above list.  The longwinded title for the press office tempts the thought of an alternative acronym, but I had better not spell it out.  What we really want to know from Wim Duisenberg at the ECB is what they are going to do next, not what they did in 2000.  I can't help feeling that to debate human rights issues across the world is really a staggeringly complacent piece of self-satisfied indulgence which presumes we are superior to the rest (a dubious proposition when set against some of the authoritarian acts of a New Labour Home Secretary).  And aid for Yugoslavia should be sub titled payment for delivery of former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevich to The Hague.

 

BUSINESS AS USUAL

On Tuesday, I have my regular clutch of meetings and a few more.  The first extra is a discussion among Industry Committee officers, co-ordinators and rapporteurs for the Sixth Framework Programme of European Research.  This meeting is about the schedule for the various stages of the Report and boils down to shall we play it long to give time to consider all the amendments that will undoubtedly be put down and to conduct informal discussion with the Council or shall we try to push ahead with the first reading to show we are treating the matter with appropriate seriousness.

 

COMPROMISES

Because the Commissioner responsible is Belgian, the Belgian Presidency will naturally be keen to make good progress.  However, the Parliament will wish to display some power by bidding up the proposed budget as well as changing the content of some of the programmes.  So we want to make haste slowly to encourage flexibility on both counts.  I suggest a timetable somewhere in between which being a typical European compromise enables more or less everyone to go off content.

 

PARLIAMENTARY TOUR

My next activity is to meet up with Tom Kuhn and family for a quick tour of the Parliament.  He is the President of the Edison Electrical Institute which is the trade association for the electricity industry in the USA and has come to speak at a European Energy Foundation dinner debate on the new US energy policy and what happened in California.  His wife and he have two young daughters aged 5 and 7 which presents me with a bit of a challenge to make the European Parliament building interesting and entertaining.  I mean, there is a limit to how many times you can get them to push the lift (sorry, elevator) buttons.  Situation is compounded by Mr & Mrs K saying they like the architecture, so I have to bite my tongue and hold back some of my more acerbic comments.  Fortunately, a couple of chocolat chauds and seats in the tribune (visitors gallery) seem to fit the bill.

 

CBI VISIT

After votes at noon I have a bit of a gap to enable me to catch up on faxes and papers before I get a call to help a couple of visitors from the CBI get into the Parliament.  This means a walk across the river and through the old building, but serves to underline that Conservative MEPs are responding to the CBI.  It also means we can have a chat about one or two activities we are doing with them later this year.

 

INDUSTRY REPORT

Then it's off to chair my co-ordination meeting for all EPP-ED (European Peoples Party-European Democrats) members of the Industry Committee.  We discuss the progress on the Research Report; final details on the second reading of the draft directive for generating electricity from renewable energy sources; who should do an opinion on low sulphur fuels; and the first reading on a report about allocating frequency spectrum for mobile telephony.

 

 

PROMOTING BOURNEMOUTH

Next a rush to our own Conservative MEPs delegation meeting for an exchange of views with Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the U.K. Permanent Representative to the E.U.  I only catch the tail end as the meeting begins at 3 p.m. while my Industry meeting ends at 3.30 p.m.  We also discuss other issues coming up during the week, especially the Take-Over Directive final reading, before moving on to debate our effective exclusion from the preliminary stages of the leadership contest and where to suggest the EPP-ED study days should be located in the UK in September 2002.  I naturally argue strongly for Bournemouth (sorry Torbay, but Bournemouth is where the Party Conference goes every other year) and the decision is deferred until September.

 

TRICKY SITUATION

After that I have a meeting with representatives of the European Chemicals Industry on the White Paper Report which is being done jointly by the Environment Committee (as lead) and our Industry Committee under the Hughes procedure, whereby the lead committee undertakes to include all the opinions of the other committees.  This will be a tricky situation because the enthusiasts want to regulate the industry very tightly.

 

CARCASS BURIALS

Co-incidentally I then have a meeting with the said Mr Hughes who is a Labour MEP.  We have an issue in common concerning disposal pits for FMD (Foot and Mouth Disease) carcasses and we are planning a joint approach to the Environment Commissioner.   The object will be to present evidence of the concerns of our constituents that European health and waste regulations are being broken  by MAFF now DEFRA (Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), since the post-election re-shuffle and re-organisation. The handling of the FMD outbreak by the Government is an ongoing issue despite the apparent success they have had in brushing it under the carpet.

 

WILL THE LIGHTS GO OUT?

After that its off to chair the dinner debate on the topic 'Will the lights go out in Europe?'  This seemed to me a more attention grabbing title than Security of Supply of Energy in Europe.  It seemed to work because upwards of 60 people attended, including nearly 20 colleague MEPs, to listen to Tom Kuhn from the Edison Electrical Institute  and Alan Grant the new Director of the Oil and Gas Producers  International Association (on the question is there enough oil and gas, unsurprisingly).  Fortunately for me the only stunt anyone pulled was to bring along a model aerogenerator (a modern windmill), as I had visions of some clever type arranging to pull the plug during dinner to plunge us all in darkness.

 

KEEPING UP THE MYSTIQUE

On Wednesday morning I put in an appearance before the Backbench Committee in my capacity as Hon Treasurer of Conservative MEPs.  I used to be Chairman of the 1979 Committee, to give it the correct title, in the last Parliament, but this was the first time I had been invited to speak as a guest.  The aim was to explain our sources of funding for information and political activities as well as how the budget is put together.  This process is somewhat shrouded in secrecy for reasons of confidentiality mostly, but we treasurers never object to keeping up the mystique, so this was a good move to cast more light.  They put me through it and suggested I might care to come back again.  Of course, I said, thinking I could stand a wait.

 

CRITICAL TIMETABLE

Next I had meetings with one of the Rapporteurs pour Avis or draughtsmen of opinion for another  Committee submitting an opinion on my Report on Security of Supply as well as with the member of our secretariat covering the report with me.  The meeting went better than I thought, considering that Phillippe Herzog is a French communist.  Although he is less enthusiastic about market mechanisms and favours intervention more than I, we agree upon the importance of nuclear energy.  We shall see.  The other part of the meeting was to revise the timetable for the stages of the report including the deadline for me to produce the draft text in time for the interpreters to have it available for the first committee meeting of the summer.  I shall have to get down to it the third week in July, when I had hoped to be taking a break.

 

NOTHING IS STRAIGHTFORWARD

At noon on Wednesday we held the vote on the Lehne Report on the conciliation agreement between the European Parliament and the European Council concerning the Take-Over Directive.  This vote constituted the third and final reading of the proposal and should have been a straightforward adoption of the result of the conciliation process.  However Mr. Lehne decided he still couldn't accept the changes agreed  and whipped up opposition to such an extent that the vote was tied at 273 for 273 against, whereupon the whole proposal fell after many years work and negotiation.

 

THE POWER OF PARLIAMENT

The Germans, to put it simply, deeply resented the hostile takeover of Mannesman by Vodfafone and were determined to block any legislation perceived as making such takeovers easier.  This illustrates that Parliament does have power to stop legislation, that national interests can prevail, provided you can assemble a coalition of support among the political groups and national delegations.

 

 

TIME WILL TELL

I won't go into the detail of the affair except to say that it concerns a philosophical difference of opinion about whether hostile takeover bids are good economics by imposing competition and market forces or bad by allowing existing managers and owners to be displaced for no particular benefit.  I incline to the former view and believe the Germans will find this to be a pyrrhic victory with the cost coming in the form of worse economic performance (on top of the effects of a weak euro, I dare say), but time will tell.

 

VISIT FROM DOWN UNDER

After that I attended a two hour regular meeting of our Bureau, the management committee for the delegation of Conservative MEPs.  Followed by a meeting with a visiting MP from New Zealand in my capacity  as a Member of the European Parliament Delegation for interparliamentary relations with Australia and New Zealand.  He was a whip for the ruling Labour Party Government, but seemed more interested in talking about our recent

General Election.  He did observe that he felt the EP was almost surreal which seems to me not a bad description of the odd way we do things.  I was able to steer him onto the somewhat controversial decision by New Zealand to effectively abandon its air defence capability on grounds of cost.  This had not gone down terribly well in Australia, even in the Australian Labour Party as we discovered during the Delegation visit there in May.

 

THE TWO GILLES CLUB

Next on my agenda came the inaugural meeting of the Ciel & Espace  InterGroup, the Aerospace cross party body aimed at promoting European industry.  I had played a role in getting it re-established along with a French Socialist MEP called Gilles Savary.  He was confirmed as President and I became First Vice-President.  I think of it as the "Two Gilles Club".

 

A EUROPEAN SKY

Anyway we agreed a forward programme of meetings about aerospace in the 6th Framework Programme of Research, about the Commission proposal for unifying European air traffic control into what they call a single European sky, about Galileo the alternative navigation and communication satellite system and about trade disputes with the USA over what constitutes state aids for Airbus and Boeing.  So there is plenty to discuss and I hope to keep the flag flying for U.K. interests, by playing a leading part in this InterGroup.

 

WHO WILL WIN?

After that it was back to my office to check for messages and sift paper before heading off to our delegation (Conservative MEPs and staff) summer reception aimed at sending everyone off in a good mood for the Summer Break.  I don't mind admitting that I enjoyed it and the dining club dinner I attended afterwards.  The conversation flowed, particularly about the leadership contest at home.  We seem to have captured the interest of the media and the press in a contest which will take a long time and whose outcome seems by no means clear.  Whoever wins has a mighty challenge on his hands because we need to do much more than just change faces at the top.

 

MEPs OPINION SHOULD COUNT

I look forward with interest to hearing from those candidates who take the trouble to meet we MEPs who, after all, are the only Conservative Parliamentarians who were elected by the whole country not just 25% of it like the MPs.  Conservative MPs represent just a quarter of the constituencies in the U.K.


STRANGE WORLD

On a different note altogether, I travelled back to England on Thursday evening, earlier than my usual practice of returning on Fridays, so as to be home in good

time for a most important date on Friday.  On the journey I spent a little time reading a book my elder son gave me for Christmas last year, but have only just found time to start.  Its title is Hannibal and is about one Dr. Hannibal Lector who is not only a killer but a cannibal.  It is a gripping yarn but I was struck by the irony of a lifelong vegetarian like myself reading such a book.

 

AN ENGLISH SUMMER

That most important date?  Well once a year, I make a pilgrimage to Henley Royal Regatta to watch some rowing and wallow down memory lane to the time when I competed for my school, college or club at the regatta.  In those days I viewed the spectators on the bank as being rather superfluous to the main business of rowing.  Nowadays, I like to think that my spending time and money in the enclosure helps to pay for all the facilities of the course enjoyed by today's oarsmen, just as the spectators then contributed towards my enjoyment on the river

thirty to forty years ago.  What a contrast to Strasbourg, what a quintessentially English occasion it all is, and long may it remain so.

 

ENJOY THE SUMMER

I wish everyone a long, warm and restful summer.  I look forward to resuming normal service at the end of August.

 

   Please note that there will not be a Letter in August, the next will be Sepember

Giles Chichester

48 Queen Street

EXETER EX4 3SR

Tel:- 01392 491815

Fax:- 01392 491588

Email/Website:

GilesChichesterMEP@eclipse.co.uk

   

 

  

[toc.htm]