|
The land of
uncertainty
The last few weeks have been a period of uncertainty and difficulty.
The main reason being connected with the half way point in the
Parliament’s five year term. At this time, all the posts or offices
are up for renewal or change and that included my role as Chairman of
the Industry, Research and Energy Committee which I have performed
since July 2004.
The d’Hondt system
The way all the posts are filled is a complex affair driven by the
numerical strength of every political group and every national
delegation within the groups in the Parliament according to the
proportional rules of the d’Hondt system which create a priority list
so all know their turn to bid for a vacancy.
Committee Chairmen
The long and short of it was that when it came to committee
chairmanships it was agreed between the groups that each would retain
the chairs they held in the first half, which eased my anxieties over
rumours that the outgoing President (or Speaker) of the Parliament, a
Spanish socialist, had sought my chair for the second half.
Poles, Czechs and Germans
However, that turned out to be the least of my worries because within
our group much was to change. Our Poles found themselves first on the
bidding list and took the Foreign Affairs Committee much to the
chagrin of our Germans who were desperate to hang onto it during their
Presidency of the Council until the end of June 2007. Next in line
were the Czechs and they took the Environment Committee, also
previously held by a German colleague.
Political manoeuvring
There followed an extended period of manoeuvring and political
pressure as the Germans tried to dissuade the Poles and Czechs.
Eventually the Germans said bad luck Giles we must take the next best
committee which is yours. They also took Budgets which had previously
had a Polish Chairman.
South West Chairman for Agriculture
Fortunately our Conservative delegation leader was able to take the
Agriculture Committee which was left vacant because the previous
incumbent had been elected Leader of our Group. So the job went to my
S W colleague Neil Parish MEP and I, of course, wish him well in it. |
Another door opens
Change is good for us all and things have not turned out so bad for me
after all because Neil stood down from his Chairmanship of the
delegation for interparliamentary relations with Australia and New
Zealand in my favour. It has been a long nurtured ambition of mine to
take this post so as my mother used to say one door closes and another
opens. I could have done without the uncertainty though.
Co-ordinator for ITRE Committee again
I also stood for the post of co-ordinator for our group members on the
Industry, Research and Energy Committee. I held this position 1999 to
2004 and managed to get elected again this time. A co-ordinator is a
low profile position of some power in the scheme of things, a
combination of whip, leader and spokesman, whereas being Chairman has
more status.
Challenges ahead
So, now I know where I am, I can look forward to the challenges of the
second half, in the energy and telecoms fields in particular. I
continue as President (or Chairman) of the European Energy Forum
addressing policy issues right across the energy spectrum.
Travel disruptions
The difficulty I mentioned at the beginning has been all about
travel. Considering the amount of travelling I have to do I count
myself pretty lucky that most of the time things go smoothly. Not so
in the past couple of months. In December, the fogs caused my flight
back home to be cancelled so I had to look sharp for an alternative
route. In January the great gales caused my flight home, from
Strasbourg this time, to be cancelled (or was it BA chief Willy Walsh
doing a pre-emptive action to show resolution to would-be strikers?)
so I had to look around sharpish again. And the third was at the
beginning of February Strasbourg when, yet again, my flight was
cancelled and I had to go on a later flight.
I just hope that was the proverbial third thing
and will be enough for a while.
|
Comment
Very recently I visited the Samaritans in
Exeter in response to an invitation to learn more about their work.
It was well worth doing and I did indeed learn more than I expected.
A number of messages came across.
You don’t need to be suicidal to
phone Samaritans. I would guess most of us do associate Samaritans
with suicidal tendencies yet their service is about providing a
friendly ear or face for anyone with any kind of stress or emotional
concern to unburden themselves and real suicidal types are fewer than
one might imagine.
It’s not like “Phone a Friend” in Who
Wants to be a Millionaire. They don’t aim to be an information
service; in fact they make a point of being listeners not advisers.
It’s not like phoning a call centre in
some far-flung location or doing battle with a disembodied voice and
press button instructions automatic phone system because they pride
themselves that every call is answered by a volunteer so your first
contact is directly with the volunteer.
You can’t just turn up and put in a couple
of hours at the end of a phone because they put a lot of effort into
training their volunteers how to offer callers the time and space to
work through their problems.
Unsurprisingly more calls come at night
when spirits are at their lowest ebb and people feel loneliness and
desperation most keenly.
I have always thought Samaritans
are wonderful people and a wonderful organisation but now I learn they
were somewhat misnamed by the newspaper which coined their description
as The Good Samaritans. The original Samaritan stopped, intervened
and was pro-active, if you like, and behaved quite differently from
the way in which modern Samaritans operate. Despite being labelled
after a Christian parable the Samaritans are resolutely
non-denominational.
To close, just in case of need, here are
their contact details 08457 909090 or
jo@samaritans.org or drop into their local branch for a face to
face. We politicians owe them a lot, if they didn’t exist our
caseload would rocket, I reckon. So, keep on listening
Samaritans please!
 |